subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
 |
|
|
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
| Title |
Author |
Date |
| What about it? |
[email protected] |
Jul 16, 2006
|
While part of the Intelligent Design mantra is that evolutionists insulate their maerialistic philosophy from pontential refutation, this isn't really Coulter's argument.
She is convinced that evolution is plainly confuted by the scientific evidence. She is astoundingly wrong in this belief, as I have noted and will continue to explain in subsequent posts.
And one may note a new wrinkle: Bill Dembski's non-reply to my Coulter inquiries, posted at his Uncommon Descent blog site.
|
| Related Articles: |
Secondary Addiction: Ann Coulter on Evolution
|
|
|
