subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
|
|
|
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
Seems we're in the same boat |
Zeligman, Naftali |
Dec 05, 2004
|
[continued]
> That Solomon's Writings should be used as a source for deriving laws seems
> entirely appropriate given his tremendous wisdom and knowledge of Torah.
> Why shouldn't his Halakhic authority be a source for derivation of laws by
> later sages?
The point is not wisdom or knowledge of Torah. The point is legal validity.
If the source of law is a God-given teaching, then for a pronouncement to be
legally binding it has to be incorporated in that teaching or to be issued
by a person or a body whom that teaching provides with authority to make
legally binding pronouncements. Similarly, the US supreme court may issue a
legal verdict based on the authority vested into it by the Constitution, and
it is this authority which makes such verdict legally binding -- not the
judges' wisdom or knowledge of American law.
|
Related Articles: |
Letter to My Rabbi
|
|
|