subscribe to our mailing list:
|
SECTIONS
|
|
|
|
Letters
[Write a Reply]
[Letters Index]
Title |
Author |
Date |
Rebutting the blatantly empty discourse |
Tremblay, Francois |
Jul 19, 2004
|
I don't mean to be rude, but I am not the one who started repeating himself. You keep arguing that I went out of my way to make a logical rebuttal to Craig by changing the definition of "nothing". Unless you can point to a definition of "nothing" which is better adapted to the context of our metaphysical discussion, and which does not include absence of potentiality, then you might have a case. Otherwise, there is no point in this discussion.
In either case, thank you for the letter and interest.
|
Related Articles: |
Dr. Craig's Unsupported Premise
|
|
|